Police Journal Online
August 2004
Volume 85 Number 4


"serving the protectors"
Police Journal Online Cover
 PASAweb   Index & Search   Top of Page   Comments   Email to Editor 

To accept or reject life-sustaining treatment

Debates about voluntary euthanasia overshadow the more important issue of palliative care. In reality, good palliative care is about dying with dignity – the same issue people think they cover when they discuss euthanasia.

Palliative care aims not to cure but to comfort, relieve pain and distress for the dying, and help patients, families and friends to approach death and recover from grief.

One of the objectives of the Palliative Care Council of South Australia – a voluntary organization of more than 500 members – is to advocate the needs, rights and interests of people who are dying, and those who care for them.

Laws about palliative care are found in South Australia’s Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995. This act might require people to think about resuscitation, or whether, after an operation, a stroke or an accident, they would want to be revived.

The SA act – the first in the world to contain the words “palliative care” in its title – has provisions based on the patient’s right to self-determination. The value of the legislation is that it emphasizes the obligation of the doctor to respect the right of the patient.

The importance of a good relationship between the patient, family and doctor is evident when the doctor needs to understand the wishes of the patient, and what he or she might like to do before something happens. This is difficult if the patient has had a stroke, cannot talk, or is unconscious after a head injury.

Some medical conditions can be predicted to leave a patient in that situation. So the challenge is for the patient and doctor (and, maybe, the family) to talk about possibilities in advance.

Talking about a possibility of something going wrong can immediately make a patient feel uncomfortable. “Why are you asking me about being unconscious? he or she might ask. “Why do you think I will have a stroke?”

The common medical answer is: “We do not expect something to go wrong, but what if it did? What if the natural progression of the illness meant we couldn’t talk about the situation in the future and need to talk about the possibility now?”

Patients will be able to make advance decisions about the kind of treatment they want, or do not want, in the event they are not able to decide for themselves in the future. A decision made in this way is called an anticipatory direction (Schedule 2 under the Consent Act). It may be used alone or together with a Medical Power of Attorney, so that the medical agent can consent to, or refuse treatment, in circumstances that may not have been foreseen.

Following the discussions about how someone prefers to be cared for in the event of a crippling illness, the doctor might need to treat the person in the way he or she believes the patient would want. For someone unconscious and in pain, a pain-killer injection might be needed. Knowing in advance of the patient’s preference for relief of his or her suffering, the doctor might give an injection (commonly morphine for extreme pain).

A side effect of morphine is depression of the breathing. Large amounts of morphine can stop breathing altogether. For cases in which a doctor administers morphine knowing that the patient might die, but also that his or her anticipatory direction is for the doctor to try to ease the pain, the act provides an interpretation:

Medical Practitioners and those administering treatment under medical supervision will be protected from civil and criminal liability if they administer treatment to relieve pain and distress, even though an incidental effect of the treatment is to hasten death.

Also true is that the doctor does not have to do everything to keep the patient alive. Medical practitioners who care for dying patients are not obliged to use life-sustaining measures if there is no prospect of recovery.

The issues around dying are difficult to discuss; and the emotions associated with death add a complexity to the whole subject. So it makes good sense to discuss some of these things when you are well.

You should think about what you would want done if you could not speak or were, indeed, unconscious. Then you can ask someone to help guide you through those times.

If you have chosen someone (a medical agent) to act for you, that agent, who must be 18 or older, can make sure your wishes about medical treatment are carried out. Any adult you trust to carry out your wishes can be your medical agent. He or she must be willing to sign a form known as a Medical Power of Attorney.

A medical agent can say “yes” or “no” to treatment but cannot refuse food or water for you, refuse treatment to ease your pain or distress, or refuse treatment that could result in you becoming well enough to tell your doctor what you want.

If you want to let people know your views, now might be the right time to start talking. Also important is to talk to your family and friends. They might be facing their own mortality and need your support when they are sick.

If in doubt, talk to doctors or go to the website of the Palliative Care Council of SA Inc (www.pallcare.asn.au).

Your questions answered

Dr Pearce will answer questions on any health issue important to you.
For his response, write to or fax the Police Journal with your question.
Writers need not identify themselves.

  • Police Journal, PO Box 6128, Halifax St, Adelaide, SA, 5000
  • Internal dispatch, post code 168
  • Fax: 8231 0855

If you prefer to use e-mail, send messages to the associate editor
(brettwilliams@pj.asn.au).



 PASAweb   Index & Search   Top of Page   Comments   Email to Editor 
The Police Journal Online is an official publication of the Police Association of South Australia and is published monthly.
Editors of kindred publications can seek permission from the Editor to re-publish any Police Journal Online article.


Copyright 2004 The Police Association of South Australia




sustance